Rail travel costs 358% more than driving, yet triples carbon savings

Rail travel costs 358% more than driving, yet triples carbon savings

The put up Rail travel costs 358% more than driving, yet triples carbon savings appeared first on TD (Journey Day by day Media) Travel Daily Media.

New knowledge has revealed the urgent dilemma of reducing prices or carbon emissions for Brits, as practice journey is found to be 358% dearer than driving.

In response to a 4.9% rail fare hike in March 2024, many UK commuters and travellers are choosing cheaper modes of transport. Regardless of being the bottom carbon choice, the ever-rising prices of rail fares now not justify travelling by practice for a lot of travellers. What’s the true carbon influence, and the way a lot are folks actually saving?

To seek out out, Progressive Power Consultants has analysed 11 journeys to main cities within the UK and in contrast the monetary and environmental prices of travelling through automotive, practice, and aircraft for 2 folks.

The simple monetary financial savings of driving 

The analysis reveals a median journey between cities within the UK prices £34.19 in petrol for 2 folks and £156.38 for 2 practice tickets. This implies travelling through practice is 358% dearer than driving a automotive. See the breakdown beneath:

Is flying higher? 

For 9 out of 11 journeys, flying is extra reasonably priced than taking the practice. In a single situation, it’s even cheaper to fly than drive! Shockingly, flying from London to Edinburgh prices simply £36 for 2 aircraft tickets in comparison with £39.44 for a tank of petrol cut up between two folks in a automotive and £97 for 2 practice tickets.

The environmental dilemma 

Throughout the 11 journeys analysed, two flyers can be accountable for 2.8 tonnes of CO2e, in comparison with two rail passengers producing 0.37 tonnes of CO2e, making flying 7.7 occasions as polluting as practice journey.

Travelling 200 miles (the equal distance from Manchester to London) prices greater than triple the quantity to journey through practice than it does for a tank of petrol cut up between two folks (£64 versus £18.91). The draw back? Driving this distance emits virtually triple the quantity of carbon than two folks travelling through practice (51 kgCO2e versus 18 kgCO2e).

On common, travelling through practice emits 33 kgCO2e of carbon for 2 passengers whereas driving produces 100 kgCO2e of carbon emissions. The distinction? A whopping 67 kgCO2e – that means automobiles produce virtually triple the quantity of greenhouse fuel emissions.

Eleanor Akers, Director and Founding father of Progressive Power Consultants, a sustainability and technique consultancy for companies, feedback:

“Each time somebody chooses the practice over driving, they’re taking a automotive off the UK’s overcrowded roads and lowering Greenhouse Fuel emissions and air air pollution. Each time they select the practice over flying, they’re signalling to the market that sustainability issues. Sadly, the UK’s regulatory surroundings will not be sending the identical indicators with trains paying taxes on vitality that airways are exempt from. As a nation, we’ve got a legally binding internet zero by 2050 goal. I don’t understand how we will attain this when companies and strange individuals are being requested to pay such a excessive worth for sustainability throughout a cost-of-living disaster.

“I urge everybody to signal this petition to assist make practice journey genuinely reasonably priced and to jot down to their MP to allow them to understand how necessary this difficulty is to each financial progress and attaining our nationwide sustainability targets. I additionally urge companies to set an inner carbon worth and use this to create clear enterprise journey insurance policies to empower employees to make the sustainable alternative wherever potential.”

Progressive Power Consultants is offering free sustainability session periods for companies as a part of its efforts to assist a extra sustainable future. Companies in search of actionable recommendation on develop into extra sustainable can e book a free 15-minute session name.

 

 

 

 

The put up Rail travel costs 358% more than driving, yet triples carbon savings appeared first on Travel Daily Media.


Source link

1 thoughts on “Rail travel costs 358% more than driving, yet triples carbon savings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To provide you with a personalized and enhanced browsing experience, we use cookies on our website. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies is paramount concern. Click on the following privacy policy link to learn more.